One of the repeating themes of The Case Against Barack Obama is his calculated indecision.  He seldom takes a stand on an issue, being purposefully vague so that people can see in him what they want to see.  This has actually worked for him, as he's risen up from nowhere to be a Presidential contender.  Anyone considering a his qualifications should ask themselves a few questions.

What will Putin see in him?  If people see what they want to see, will Putin will see a formidable foe who should not be tested, or will he see a weak, pushover of a leader who will sell his country dearly for what he thinks is peace?

What will fundamentalist Muslims who would kill Americans wontonly see in a leader who writes in his book The Audacity Of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'  Will they see someone who will stand up to them, or someone who will open the door to them, allowing America's "chickens" to "come home to roost." as Jeremiah Wright said so eloquently.

Obama's associations with Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright and Tony Rezko, among others, should give people pause enough.  But couple them with his decisive indecision, allowing people to make of him what they will, and there are some very dangerous possibilities ahead for this country if Obama, the invisible leader, wins the election.